Member-only story

Down Dirty: The Plot to Steal the Presidency

José Martí

·9k Followers· Follow

Published in Jake Tapper

5 min read

496 View Claps

62 Respond

Save

Listen

Down Dirty: The Plot To Steal The Presidency Is A Book By Greg Palast That Investigates The 2004 US Presidential Election. Down Dirty: The Plot To Steal The Presidency

In his book Down Dirty: The Plot to Steal the Presidency, Greg Palast investigates the 2004 US presidential election and alleges that the election was stolen from Democratic candidate John Kerry. Palast's allegations are based on his own investigation, which included interviews with voters, election officials, and political operatives.

Down & Dirty: The Plot to Steal the Presidency

by Jake Tapper

4.2 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1108 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	536 pages

Palast's book has been praised by some for its investigative journalism, but it has also been criticized by others for its lack of evidence and for its partisan bias. However, Palast's allegations have raised important questions about the integrity of the 2004 election and have helped to fuel a growing movement for electoral reform.

Palast's Allegations

Palast's allegations of voter fraud in the 2004 election are based on his own investigation, which included interviews with voters, election officials, and political operatives. Palast alleges that there was widespread voter suppression in Ohio, Florida, and other swing states, and that this suppression was orchestrated by the Republican Party.

Palast also alleges that there was widespread voter fraud in the 2004 election, including the use of electronic voting machines to rig the election. Palast claims that these machines were programmed to delete votes for Kerry and to add votes for Bush.

Palast's allegations are serious and, if true, would represent a major threat to the integrity of the American electoral system. However, it is important to note that Palast's allegations are just that: allegations. They have not been proven in a court of law, and they have been disputed by many election officials.

Evidence for Palast's Allegations

Palast's allegations of voter fraud in the 2004 election are based on a variety of evidence, including:

Interviews with voters who were turned away from the polls or who had their votes suppressed in other ways.
Interviews with election officials who witnessed voter fraud or who were pressured to change the results of the election.
Statistical analysis of voting data that shows anomalies that could be consistent with voter fraud.
Analysis of electronic voting machines that shows that they are vulnerable to hacking and manipulation.

However, it is important to note that Palast's evidence is not conclusive. Some of his witnesses have recanted their stories, and some of his statistical analysis has been disputed. Additionally, the electronic voting machines that Palast alleges were used to rig the election have not been independently tested.

Criticism of Palast's Allegations

Palast's allegations of voter fraud in the 2004 election have been criticized by many, including election officials, political scientists, and journalists. Critics argue that Palast's evidence is weak and that his allegations are based on partisan bias.

For example, a study by the Brennan Center for Justice found that there was no evidence of widespread voter fraud in the 2004 election. The study also found that Palast's allegations of voter suppression were exaggerated.

Additionally, many election officials have disputed Palast's allegations of fraud. For example, Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell has said that there was no evidence of widespread voter fraud in Ohio in the 2004 election.

Palast's allegations of voter fraud in the 2004 election are serious and, if true, would represent a major threat to the integrity of the American electoral system. However, it is important to note that Palast's allegations are just that: allegations. They have not been proven in a court of law, and they have been disputed by many election officials.

The evidence for Palast's allegations is mixed. Some of his witnesses have recanted their stories, and some of his statistical analysis has been disputed. Additionally, the electronic voting machines that Palast alleges were used to rig the election have not been independently tested.

Overall, it is unclear whether Palast's allegations are true. More research is needed to determine whether there was widespread voter fraud in the 2004 election.

Down & Dirty: The Plot to Steal the Presidency

by Jake Tapper

4.2 out of 5